Prevention Challenges

Why Problems with Reprocessing Ureteroscopes ‘Haven’t Gone Away’

“This indicates that the problems haven’t gone away, and possibly, more people are filing reports since they heard about this risk and they were urged by the FDA to submit reports,” Cori Ofstead said of the more than 100 medical device reports filed on flexible ureteroscopes since the agency announced an investigation into reprocessed urological endoscopes.

More than 100 new medical device reports (MDRs) on flexible ureteroscopes have been filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration since the agency released a letter to healthcare providers last spring announcing its investigation into numerous MDRs involving reprocessed urological endoscopes.

This was among the key findings presented in a recent OR Manager webinar featuring Cori Ofstead, an epidemiologist with more than 25 years of research experience.

Since the FDA issued its letter on April 1, 2021, 105 MDRs have been filed with the agency on flexible ureteroscopes. This includes more than 35 in both August and October of 2021. These reports included:

  • Patient injuries or exposures (5)
  • Reprocessing breaches (11)
  • Contamination (18)
  • Damaged scopes (72)

“This indicates that the problems haven’t gone away, and possibly, more people are filing reports since they heard about this risk and they were urged by the FDA to submit reports,” Ofstead said.

In addition to filing MDRs for adverse events involving urology scopes, the FDA also urged manufacturers to:

  • Carefully follow reprocessing instructions
  • Increase awareness of reprocessing instructions for reusable accessories
  • Cease use of damaged scopes
  • Develop schedules for inspection and maintenance
  • Inform patients of risks associated with reprocessed urology endoscopes

Ofstead offered a detailed breakdown of the complex designs of ureteroscopes, which are significantly smaller than many other endoscopes and therefore require inspection under magnification after each cleaning. She also suggested quality management programs worth implementing. These included considering the role of single-use ureteroscopes.

Ofstead leads a multidisciplinary team that specializes in designing and conducting real-world studies to validate healthcare guidelines, treatments, and product claims.

Click here to watch the full webinar.

More Urology Articles
Podcast: Why Bladder Cancer Patients Should Get Vaccinated
Preventing Infection
“In terms of the vaccination, there’s really no evidence to suggest that that will interfere with their bladder cancer treatment,” Dr. Seth P. Lerner said on the Bladder Cancer Matters podcast.
How Bladder Cancer Patients Should Navigate the BCG Shortage
Public Health
“The most important thing is to have a discussion with your urologist as a first step to see how important is it that you get BCG,” Robert Svatek, MD, said on the Bladder Cancer Matters podcast.
More From Single-Use Endoscopy
How Much Does It Really Cost to Own Endoscopes?

Value-Based Care

Ownership costs are hidden in capital accounts, expensive service contracts and repair agreements that are capitated, a medical device industry executive writes.

How to Stop the Cycle of ‘Reactive Repairs’ on Endoscopes

Prevention Challenges

They are costly, add stress for staff and put patients at risk.

Study Evaluates Single-Use Gastroscope Feasibility in Evaluating, Treating Upper GI Bleeding

Emerging Technologies

Single-use duodenoscopes are already common for ERCP, but what about gastroscopes and EGD?