Infection Outbreak Linked to Reusable Cystoscope Irrigation Plugs

Preventing Infection

Infection Outbreak Linked to Reusable Cystoscope Irrigation Plugs

"The irrigation plugs were not disassembled during sterile processing, per the manufacturer's recommendations. Those instructions also included thorough cleaning and interior wiping."

When conducting outbreak investigations, it is crucial to consider ancillary equipment such as irrigation plugs as a potential source of infection.

That’s one conclusion to be drawn from recent research detailed in the Journal of Hospital Infection. Investigators detailed a case at the University Hospitals of Leicester in the UK, where irrigation plugs were determined to be the cause of an infection outbreak associated with 15 cystoscopy procedures.

Irrigation Plugs Exposed 

Irrigation plugs, which control the flow of irrigation fluid during a cystoscopy, were contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a bacteria known to cause infections in the blood and lungs.

The bacterial contamination came to light when the hospital's microbiology laboratory identified two severe patient cases. The irrigation plugs were not disassembled during sterile processing, per the manufacturer's recommendations. Those instructions also included thorough cleaning and interior wiping, investigators found.

The manufacturer's sterilization instructions also suggested autoclaving, but that was incompatible with UK standards. Instead, the staff used an automated endoscope washer disinfector to clean the plugs.

Swift Action and Manufacturer Response

Upon discovering this issue, the hospital suspended all cystoscopy procedures and implemented stricter control measures.

The changes included buying a low-temperature hydrogen peroxide sterilizer specifically for cystoscopes. The hospital also retrained all staff in the sterile processing department on the correct disassembly, cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization of both irrigation plugs and cystoscopes before reusing them.

The problem, however, persisted when cystoscopy procedures resumed in September 2020, leading to the hospital reporting the issue to governing officials, who subsequently contacted the manufacturer.

In 2021, the manufacturer issued new reprocessing instructions emphasizing device disassembly before decontamination and introducing enhanced sterilization methods. They also issued a field safety notice to alert providers about the potential risk of patient infections if they didn’t follow reprocessing procedures.

Single-use cystoscopes reduce the risk of cross-contamination. One study found that single-use cystoscopes led to fewer post-procedure complications and infections compared with procedures performed with a reusable scope.

Related Articles

What Was the Source of Infection in a Pseudo-Outbreak Among Urology Patients?

Contaminated Rinse Water Causes Pseudo-Outbreak in China


More Urology Articles
Why You Don't Know What Burnout Is 'Until It Hits You in the Face'
Public Health
Medicine’s culture of perfection leaves physicians susceptible to burnout and depression, a urologic oncology surgeon and life coach says on the Speaking of Urology podcast.
Why Problems with Reprocessing Ureteroscopes ‘Haven’t Gone Away’
Prevention Challenges
In a new webinar, Cori Ofstead tallies the new medical device reports on flexible ureteroscopes filed with the FDA since last spring and suggests quality management programs worth implementing for reprocessing.
More From Single-Use Endoscopy
5 Questions to Consider When Procuring Endoscopes for Your Healthcare Facility

Emerging Technologies

Covering all the bases when procuring endoscopes can be challenging. Single-use options offer potential solutions, balancing infection control, cost, and environmental impact.

A look at what

Best Practices

From progress in the gender wage gap to new roles for physician assistants, the otolaryngology space is a busy place.

Study: Single-Use Duodenoscopes Are Capable of High Completion Rates in ERCP

Preventing Infection

Research presented recently at ACG 2023 proves this, as well as low adverse event rates from single-use models.