Assessing respiratory therapists performance when it comes to intubations.

Patient Safety

How Effectively Do Respiratory Therapists Perform Endotracheal Intubation?

Videolaryngoscopy was used in 65 percent of the initial attempts and was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate, higher overall success rate and fewer adverse events, according to the study.

Respiratory therapists (RTs) have performed intubations for years, but there is little documentation assessing their performance.

A recent multicenter study, out of Duke University Medical Center, sought to evaluate the intubation outcomes of RTs compared against those of other clinicians. In addition to RTs, typically physicians, pulmonologists, anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists are among those who perform such intubations.

The study, published in Respiratory Care, found that intubations performed by RTs had “a high success rate, with AE (adverse events) rates comparable to published results from other types of providers.”

The assessment came from data collected at two different facilities, between May 25, 2020 and April 30, 2022, based on a total of 689 intubations where RTs made an attempt. Of those, RTs were successful in 98 percent of the attempts.

Videolaryngoscopy was used in 65 percent of the initial attempts and was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate, higher overall success rate and fewer adverse events, according to the study. The most common reasons for the intubations were cardiac arrest and respiratory failure.

The airway-related adverse event rate was 8.7 percent.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Related: A Respiratory Therapist Rises to the Challenge

__________________________________________________________________________________

What Kind of Training Do RTs Receive?

In an earlier Respiratory Care study, also out of Duke University Medical Center, researcher Andrew G. Miller surveyed the kinds of endotracheal intubation training that RTs have received and the barriers that prevent them from performing intubations in some facilities.

The most common forms of training were simulation training and supervised endotracheal intubations, according to 74 people who completed surveys. Classroom training ranged from one hour to 16 hours.

About 91 percent were required to complete 10 or fewer supervised endotracheal intubations before their competency validation.

There were a variety of answers when it came to the endotracheal intubation recertification process. Most RTs were recertified by completing a minimum number of endotracheal intubations.

RTs who performed endotracheal intubation typically worked at facilities with larger bed capacity and more adult ICU beds. The most common reason cited for RTs not performing intubations at particular facilities was a lack of need for them to do so.

More Pulmonology Articles
Are You Following The Right Pulmonology Influencers?
Best Practices
For a broader look at social media in the medical world, the Healthcare Hashtag Project describes itself as a platform that connects doctors, caregivers, patient advocates and other providers to relevant conversations and communities.
Healthcare Shortage Means High Caseloads for Physicians
Public Health
A ranking of specialties by caseload answers the question of which physicians are responsible for the highest number of patients. Wonder where your specialty comes in?
More From Single-Use Endoscopy
5 Questions to Consider When Procuring Endoscopes for Your Healthcare Facility

Emerging Technologies

Covering all the bases when procuring endoscopes can be challenging. Single-use options offer potential solutions, balancing infection control, cost, and environmental impact.

A look at what

Best Practices

From progress in the gender wage gap to new roles for physician assistants, the otolaryngology space is a busy place.

Study: Single-Use Duodenoscopes Are Capable of High Completion Rates in ERCP

Preventing Infection

Research presented recently at ACG 2023 proves this, as well as low adverse event rates from single-use models.