Can HLD For Duodenoscopes With Disposable Tips Be Safely Abbreviated?

Preventing Infection

Can HLD For Duodenoscopes With Disposable Tips Be Safely Abbreviated?

Duodenoscopes with disposable components “appear to have decreased bacterial contamination” but don’t eliminate it entirely.

One manual wash cycle prior to high-level disinfection (HLD) may be sufficient in adequately disinfecting duodenoscopes utilizing disposable tips.

That’s according to evidence presented by researchers from Duke University at ACG 2022 last October, who found that one manual wash did not lead to significantly more bacteria than two cycles prior to HLD.

The authors write that duodenoscopes with disposable components “appear to have decreased bacterial contamination” but don’t eliminate it entirely. That was the takeaway of another poster also presented by the same researchers from Duke at the annual meeting.

“Our data provide impetus for larger studies of abbreviated HLD protocols and the development of technologies that expediate the HLD process,” the poster concludes.

Last year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration updated a safety communication recommending that facilities transition to innovative duodenoscope designs due to concerns about reprocessing and patient cross-contamination. Those recommendations include utilizing fully single-use duodenoscopes or models with disposable components.

“The best solution to reducing the risk of disease transmission by duodenoscopes is through innovative device designs that make reprocessing easier, more effective, or unnecessary,” the communication says.

Recently updated standards and guidelines additionally call for sterilization rather than HLD for certain “high-risk” endoscopes, including duodenoscopes.

The Duke researchers conducted the study in two phases. The first assessed efficacy of abbreviated HLD protocols with one manual wash cycle and the second one reviewing standard HLD protocols. Phase one included 46 duodenoscopes sampled at four sites apiece, with eight sites having greater than 100 culture forming units (CFU) of raw growth and 11 sites with either Vancomycin sensitive or resistant Enterococcus (VSE/VRE).

Phase two included 25 duodenoscopes also sampled at four sites each. Two out of 100 had raw growth of greater than 100 CFU and five grew VRE.

More Gastroenterology Articles
AAMI Responds to GI Societies’ ST91 Rebuttal
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Applications
A group of GI societies voiced concerns over the updated reprocessing guidelines, particularly their length, redundancies, disparate definitions, and conflicting recommendations.
Reviewing the Efficacy of Duodenoscope Reprocessing Techniques
Prevention Challenges
A literature review finds current duodenoscope reprocessing measures to be inadequate and explores several promising novel developments.
More From Single-Use Endoscopy

Preventing Infection

Olympus has received three warning letters from the agency in recent months; this one calls out “a troubling disregard for patient safety.”

Infectious diseases are about to become a bigger presence in ICUs around the world.

Preventing Infection

Only one out of five patients admitted to an ICU in recent decades landed there due to an infectious disease, but that is changing, according to one expert.

Free Resources to Celebrate the 10th Anniversary of GI Nurses and Associates Week

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Applications

The society provides you with a list of ideas to recognize the GI nurses in your department.